Writing

๐—”๐—œ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—˜๐—ญ: ๐˜๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ฉ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ ๐˜‹๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ด ๐˜ธ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฉ ๐˜ˆ๐˜

(3 Min Read)

๐Ÿ‘‚ ๐—›๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐—ณ โ€œ๐——๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜†, ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜†, ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ?โ€
I experienced a health insurance claim denial and am $1,600 out-of-pocket. Over six months, I spoke to six reps by phone. Each rep listened to what I presented and agreed that the insurer was responsible. They resubmit the claim and say the Claims Dept. will take 14โ€“21 days to review it. Of course, thereโ€™s no phone # or email for the Claims Dept. I login at 21 days: ๐——๐—˜๐—ก๐—œ๐—˜๐——! And the process starts again.

๐˜Œ๐˜น๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ.

๐Ÿ†š ๐——๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐˜ƒ๐˜€ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ
I recently finished the book ๐˜ˆ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ค ๐˜ˆ๐˜ณ๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ง๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜๐˜ฏ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜จ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ by Pascal BORNET. He discusses these concepts:

โ€ข ๐——๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€ follow defined rules and return the same result each time for a given set of inputs. Consider an accounting process for a SOX-compliant public company. Accuracy is key.
โ€ข ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€ incorporate randomness and produce different results with the same input. Think of a marketing team needing a creative list of blog post ideas.

Thatโ€™s a helpful way to think about AI solutions

๐Ÿ“๐—จ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜๐—š๐—ฃ๐—ง ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—›๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฝ ๐—œ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐— ๐˜† ๐—”๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ
So, I drafted my appeal letter and imported it into ChatGPT. If youโ€™ve used an LLM to help revise writing, you know the process can involve a few โ€œspin cyclesโ€โ€”revise, review, repeat. Many times, I request comments from GPT but rewrite myself. This time, I received a handful of comments. Exhausted, I said: โ€œGo ahead and just rewrite the letter.โ€

โœ…๐—” ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜„๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ช๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—จ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—น
Weโ€™ve all had experiences where an LLM rewrites and the result was completely off. In this case, the randomness factorย  pushed the tone of frustration that I felt. Here are three of the juiciest parts:

โ€ข ๐˜ˆ๐˜ต ๐˜ด๐˜ฐ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ต, ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ด๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜บ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜ค๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ! ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ฆ!
โ€ข ๐˜›๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ฆ๐˜น๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ค๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ด ๐˜ง๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ต ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฌ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜น๐˜ต๐˜ฃ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฌ ๐˜ฆ๐˜น๐˜ข๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง "๐˜‹๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜บ, ๐˜‹๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜บ, ๐˜‹๐˜ฆ๐˜ง๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ"โ€”๐˜ข ๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ค ๐˜ธ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ด๐˜ถ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด ๐˜ด๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ ๐˜ค๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ฎ๐˜ด, ๐˜ฆ๐˜น๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ถ๐˜ด๐˜ต ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜บ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ด, ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜บ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ข๐˜บ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ๐˜ต ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข ๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ฉ๐˜ฏ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜บ. ๐˜๐˜ด ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ๐˜บ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ ๐˜บ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ฆ?
โ€ข ๐˜ ๐˜ฆ๐˜น๐˜ฑ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ต ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ข๐˜ญ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ท๐˜ช๐˜ฆ๐˜ธ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ง ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ด๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ถ๐˜ข๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏโ€”๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฑ๐˜ต๐˜บ ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ซ๐˜ฆ๐˜ค๐˜ต๐˜ช๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ.

๐ŸŸข ๐—œ๐—ก ๐—–๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ก๐—š ๐ŸŸข
This appeal letter is a great example of when AIโ€™s probabilistic nature can deliver the punch a situation demands.

๐——๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐˜ƒ๐˜€ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ: Know when each applies in AI solutions. The randomness of a probabilistic output may be best!